Geographic Skin Why Is It Okay For National Geographic To Have Naked Pictures Of "primitive" People?
Why is it okay for National Geographic to have naked pictures of "primitive" people? - geographic skin
National Geographic has many dark images, the so-called "primitive" people in developing countries, their natural state to be topless (or entirely nude) - both men and women.
Why is OK to print pictures also, but is not printing pictures of naked people or white people in the city?
Before saying that "because in their culture, it is naked," I say, "Well, a few white people like naked - it's called or nude sunbathing - and is part of the culture of his too"
And why has no one called National Geographic pornography?
I do not think that nudity is always pornography, but some people (like John Ashcroft, who believed that the statue of the woman obscenity law in the Justice Department was, because his bare chest, so I ordered that was hushed up ... This Douchebag!)
|
17 comments:
"Primitive" people are naked is her way of life. Not bring your culture to a clothing company.
"White" as the act is an expression. Their culture has a clothing company, why be naked overcome?
I had a mother that she took her son to a travel program in Africa, because she said she could see topless women. She said she loved the animals in Africa and was very interested, but he was afraid. Sad.
Apparently the world of science and journalism who still believe that they are more like animals than humans, and what does not count as pornography.
Or maybe it is a kind of distorted education. It stinks, the NEA (National Education Association)
Whatever the cause, I am sure that the Liberal Democrats' fault!
A naked human body is not pornography.
I agree. I do not know why they do it.
I'm sure there are many white posing nude is not obligated to do something in their daily lives.
thats education, he wants to do is entertainment.
You do not know?
Images of teaching or the art is acceptable for most people.
Double standards?
You might think that the person is in a primitive society is not a valid person.
If you are the only one who cared about them.
SO WHAT?
If you are sexually aroused?.
Who cares. Everyone expects the Indians and Africans, naked, nude look, but not whites. Realisitc be. The whites are with the money. Where do you see a white trunk *** naked?
And this comes from someone who is not white.
yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Why do you send a photo of himself naked on national goegi. lol!
Because if that's how they dress in their natural environment and it is different.
Naked It is a big difference between nudity and pornography ...... Pornography is deliberately provocative and culture is what it is ...... People seldom read about in National Geographic pornography because it is very quiet to pornographic websites, which they prefer and tasteless books.Pornography what it can be done nudity: casts, bestiality, etc., etc. .. ..... All of this appears in National Geographic ... only people who work clothing daily.
They know they are naked, Duh.
It is their way of life ... Do not understand what National Geographic is this?
Their education.
Since the sex education class.
My feelings about nudity nudity ....... Pornography is only when the actors / stars are paid in U.S. dollars countless fucking have sex ...... I like it naked, I want to see naked people, no sense of sexual pleasure, but out of curiosity ..... No matter who you are, if you want to be naked or nude, other people can observe their cause, and I personally believe that the FCC should go to hell if it goes wrong to see someone who is of course without the clothes they spend the money, ..... A tube of countless designer gay let naked
Post a Comment